Supreme Court's Decision
The Supreme Court has ruled that former President Donald Trump has immunity for "official acts" as commander in chief, leaving the definition of official versus unofficial acts unclear.
Case in Jeopardy
The 6-3 ruling allows Trump's pretrial proceedings to continue in Washington DC, facing charges related to the 2020 election. The case now hinges on what constitutes an official act as President.
Trump's Response
Trump hailed the decision as a "big win for our constitution and democracy," while critics like Justice Sotomayor criticized the ruling, saying it grants former presidents criminal immunity.
Historic Precedent
This ruling reshapes the institution of the Presidency and raises questions about accountability for those in power.
Legal Background
Trump's defense team argued for "absolute immunity," citing historical precedent, but the court's decision challenges this notion.
Previous Presidential Cases
The Supreme Court has previously allowed lawsuits against sitting presidents, setting a precedent for accountability in office.
For more updates on this developing story, visit The U.S. Sun for the latest news.
Did you miss our previous article...
https://trendinginthenews.com/uk-politics/the-lowdown-on-rachel-reeves-husband-nicholas-joicey
