Dune Analytics opposes $25M Uniswap grant to competitor

Dune Analytics, a decentralized finance (DeFi) analytics service, has voiced its opposition to a Uniswap (UNI) governance vote for “Community-Enabled Analytics” that would see fellow analytics provider Flipside Crypto managing about $25 million worth of UNI tokens.

Tweeting on Thursday, Dune highlighted the lack of community attention to the matter while also stating that grants should be given to community members and not to service providers.

Indeed, the governance voting page for the proposal shows over 41 million votes in favor, against 2.5 million in opposition. The vote will end on Friday, Aug. 20 at 7:05 AM UTC+1.

According to Dune, funding one single provider among several analytics platforms “makes no sense.”

“There is no sense for @uniswap to fund @flipside’s daily operations with eight full-time employees,” Dune added in its tweet.

The grant itself will see Flipside Crypto receive $25 million in two annual installments of $15 million and $10 million respectively.

Half of the yield generated by Flipside from the fund will reportedly go towards improving the Uniswap ecosystem in the form of bounties to community members, according to the details shared in the proposal document.

The other 50% of the yield generated by Flipside will be used to fund the platform’s operations such as payment of salaries — a provision that could be construed as a 50% management fee on earnings from a community grant.

Dune Analytics and Flipside Crypto did not immediately respond to Cointelegraph’s request for comments.

Related: Uniswap proposal under fire for enabling Dharma to 'take over governance'

Dune’s opposition to the proposed $25 million grant to its competitor is the latest controversy stemming from the apparent centralization of Uniswap’s governance.

Back in July, the DeFi Education Fund came in for some criticism within the crypto space for liquidating half of its 1 million UNI token donation amounting to about $10 million at the time.

The DeFi Education Fund did defend its actions stating that the move was necessary to kickstart its operations.